Podcast: Catalyst UK seeds infrastructure innovation for next-gen supercomputing
[Editor's note: This podcast was originally published on Sept. 5, 2019.]
In high-performance computing, the more processor choices the better—and that’s especially true as a whole new generation of artificial intelligence and supercomputing use cases emerge, calling for greater specialization.
Hence the launch of the three-year Catalyst UK program in April 2018, which brings together three universities and several large companies with the aim of advancing the ARM CPU architecture to seed innovation and open up new options in HPC.
"We want the best type of processors for what we want to do today," says Mark Parsons, director of the Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre at the University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh is one of the universities running a 4,000-core ARM processor-based system to conduct their research and allow “as many people as possible to understand how difficult it will be to port their code to ARM, or rather…how easy it is,” he says.
Listen to this discussion with Parsons and Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s Dr. Eng Lim Goh as they cover a range of topics, from the Catalyst UK program and how supercomputing is still in its infancy almost 60 years after the first supercomputer was introduced to why “boring”— the seamless development and porting of code across different platforms—is paramount.
Dana Gardner: Hello, and welcome to the next edition of the BriefingsDirect Voice of the Customer podcast series. I’m Dana Gardner, principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, your host and moderator for this ongoing discussion on high-performance computing (HPC) trends and innovations.
Our next discussion explores a program to expand a variety of CPUs that support supercomputer and artificial intelligence (AI)-intensive workloads. We will now learn how the Catalyst program in the U.K. is seeding the advancement of the ARM CPU architecture for HPC as well as establishing a vibrant software ecosystem around it.
Stay with us now as we hear about unlocking new choices and innovation for the next generations of supercomputing. Please join me in welcoming our guests, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, vice president and chief technology officer for HPC and AI at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Welcome, Dr. Goh.
Dr. Eng Lim Goh: Hi, Dana. Thank you.
Mark Parsons: Hi, Dana.
Gardner: Mark, why is there a need now for more variety of choice for CPU architectures for such use cases as HPC, AI, and supercomputing?
Mark Parsons, University of Edinburgh
Parsons: In some ways, this discussion is a bit odd because we have had huge variety over the years in supercomputing with regard to processors. It’s really only the last five to eight years that we’ve ended up with the majority of supercomputers being built from the Intel x86 architecture.
It’s always good in supercomputing to be on the leading edge of technology, and getting more variety in the processor is really important. It is interesting to seek different processor designs for better performance for AI or supercomputing workloads. We want the best type of processors for what we want to do today.
Gardner: What is the Catalyst program? Why did it come about? And how does it help address those issues?
Parsons: The Catalyst UK program is jointly funded by a number of large companies and three universities: The University of Bristol, the University of Leicester, and the University of Edinburgh. It is U.K.-focused because Arm Holdings is based in the U.K. and there is a long history in the U.K. of exploring new processor technologies.
Through Catalyst, each of the three universities hosts a 4,000-core ARM processor-based system. We are running them as services. At my university, for example, we now have a number of my staff using this system. But we also have external academics using it, and we are gradually opening it up to other users.
Catalyst for change in processor
We want as many people as possible to understand how difficult it will be to port their code to ARM, or rather―as we will explore in this podcast―how easy it is.
You only learn by breaking stuff, right? And so, we are going to learn which bits of the software tool chain, for example, need some work. [Such porting is necessary] because ARM predominantly sat in the mobile phone world until recently. The supercomputing and AI world is a different space for the ARM processor to be operating in.
Gardner: Eng Lim, why is this program of interest to HPE? How will it help create new opportunity and performance benchmarks for such uses as AI?
Goh: Mark makes a number of very strong points. First and foremost, we are very keen as a company to broaden the reach of HPC among our customers. If you look at our customer base, a large portion of them come from the commercial HPC sites, the retailers, banks, and across the financial industry. Letting them reach new types of HPC is important, and a variety of offerings makes it easier for them.
Dr. Eng Lim Goh, HPE
The second thing is the recent reemergence of more AI applications, which also broadens the user base. There is also a need for greater specialization in certain areas of processor capabilities. We believe in this case, the ARM processor―given the fact that it enables different companies to build innovative variations of the processor―will provide a rich set of new options in the area of AI.
Gardner: What is it, Mark, about the ARM architecture, and specifically the Marvell ThunderX2 ARM processor, that is so attractive for these types of AI workloads?
Expanding memory for the future
Parsons: It’s absolutely the case that all numerical computing―AI, supercomputing, and desktop technical computing―is controlled by memory bandwidth. This is about getting data to the processor so the processor core can act on it.
What we see in the ThunderX2 now, as well as in future iterations of this processor, is the strong memory bandwidth capabilities. What people don’t realize is a vast amount of the time, processor cores are just waiting for data. The faster you get the data to the processor, the more compute you are going to get out with that processor. That’s one particular area where the ARM architecture is very strong.
Goh: Indeed, memory bandwidth is the key. Not only in supercomputing applications but especially in machine learning (ML) where the machine is in the early phases of learning, before it does a prediction or makes an inference.
It has to go through the process of learning, and this learning is a highly data-intensive process. You have to consume massive amounts of historical data and examples in order to tune itself to a model that can make good predictions. So, memory bandwidth is utmost in the training phase of ML systems.
And related to this is the fact that the ARM processor’s core intellectual property is available to many companies to innovate around. More companies therefore recognize they can leverage that intellectual property and build high-memory bandwidth innovations around it. They can come up with a new processor. Such an ability to allow different companies to innovate is very valuable.
Gardner: Eng Lim, does this fit in with the larger HPE drive toward memory-intensive computing in general? Does the ARM processor fit into a larger HPE strategy?
Goh: Absolutely. The ARM processor together with the other processors provide choice and options for HPE’s strategy of being edge-centric, cloud-enabled, and data-driven.
Across that strategy, the commonality is data movement. And as such, the ARM processor allowing different companies to come in to innovate will produce processors that meet the needs of all these various kinds of sectors. We see that as highly valuable, and it supports our strategy.
Gardner: Mark, Arm Holdings controls the intellectual property, but there is a budding ecosystem both on the processor design as well as the software that can take advantage of it. Tell us about that ecosystem and why the Catalyst UK program is facilitating a more vibrant ecosystem.
The design-to-build ecosystem
Parsons: The whole Arm story is very, very interesting. This company grew out of home computing about 30 to 40 years ago. The interesting thing is the way that they are an intellectual property company, at the end of the day. Arm Holdings itself doesn’t make processors. It designs processors and sells those designs to other people to make.
So, we’ve had this wonderful ecosystem of different companies making their own ARM processors or making them for other people. With the wide variety of different ARM processors in mobile phones, for example, there is no surprise that it’s the most common processor in the world today.
Now, people think that x86 processors rule the roost, but actually they don’t. The most common processor you will find is an ARM processor. As a result, there is a whole load of development tools that come both from ARM and also within the developer community that support people who want to develop code for the processors.
In the context of Catalyst UK, in talking to Arm, it’s quite clear that many of their tools are designed to meet their predominant market today: the mobile phone market. As they move into the higher-end computing space, it’s clear we may find things in the programs where the compiler isn’t optimized. Certain libraries may be difficult to compile and things like that. And this is what excites me about the Catalyst program. We are getting to play with leading-edge technology and show that it is easy to use all sorts of interesting stuff with it.
Gardner: And while the ARM CPU is being purpose-focused for high-intensity workloads, we are seeing more applications being brought in, too. How does the porting process of moving apps from x86 to ARM work? How easy or difficult is it? How does the Catalyst UK program help?
Parsons: All three of the universities are porting various applications that they commonly use. At the EPCC, we run the national HPC service for the UK called ARCHER. As part of that, we have run national [supercomputing] services since 1994, but as part of the ARCHER service, we decided for the first time to offer many of the common scientific applications as modules.
You can just ask for the module that you want to use. Because we saw users compiling their own copies of code, we had multiple copies, some of them identically compiled, others not compiled particularly well.
So, we have a model of offering about 40 codes on ARCHER as precompiled where we are trying to keep them up to date and we patch them, etc. We have 100 staff at EPCC that look after code. I have asked those staff to get an account on the Catalyst system, take that code across and spend an afternoon trying to compile. We already know for some that they just compile and run. Others may have some problems, and it’s those that we’re passing on to ARM and HPE, saying, “Look, this is what we found out.”
The important thing is that we found there are very few programs [with such problems]. Most code is simply recompiling very, very smoothly.
Gardner: How does HPE support that effort, both in terms of its corporate support but also with the IT systems themselves?
Goh: We are very keen about the work that Mark and the Catalyst program are doing. As Mark mentioned, the ARM processor came more from the edge-centric side of our strategy—in mobile phones, for example.
Now we are very keen to see how far these ARM systems can go. Already we have shipped to the U.S. Department of Energy at the Sandia National Lab a large ARM processor-based supercomputer called Astra. These efforts are ongoing in the area of HPC applications. We are very keen to see how this processor and the compilers for it work with various HPC applications in the U.K. and the U.S.
Gardner: And as we look to the larger addressable market, with the edge and AI being such high-growth markets, it strikes me that supercomputing―something that has been around for decades―is not fully mature. We are entering a whole new era of innovation.
Mark, do you see supercomputing as in its heyday, sunset years, or perhaps even in its infancy?
Parsons: I absolutely think that supercomputing is still in its infancy. There are so many bits in the world around us that we have never even considered trying to model, simulate, or understand on supercomputers. It’s strange because quite often people think that supercomputing has solved everything―and it really hasn’t. I will give you a direct example of that.
A few years ago, a European project I was running won an award for simulating the highest accuracy of water flowing through a piece of porous rock. It took over a day on the whole of the national service [to run the simulation]. We won a prize for this, and we only simulated 1 cubic centimeter of rock.
People think supercomputers can solve massive problems―and they can―but the universe and the world are complex. We’ve only scratched the surface of modeling and simulation.
This is an interesting moment in time for AI and supercomputing. For a lot of data analytics, we have at our fingertips for the very first time very, very large amounts of data. It’s very rich data from multiple sources, and supercomputers are getting much better at handling these large data sources.
The reason the whole AI story is really hot now, and lots of people are involved, is not actually about the AI itself. It’s about our ability to move data around and use our data to train AI algorithms. The link directly into supercomputing is because in our world, we are good at moving large amounts of data around. The synergy now between supercomputing and AI is not to do with supercomputing or AI—it is to do with the data.
Gardner: Eng Lim, how do you see the evolution of supercomputing? Do you agree with Mark that we are only scratching the surface?
Top-down and bottom-up data crunching
Goh: Yes, absolutely, and it’s an early scratch. It’s still very early. I will give you an example
Solving games is important to develop a method or strategy for cyberdefense. If you just take the most recent game that machines are beating the best human players, the game of Go, is much more complex than chess in terms of the number of potential combinations. The number of combinations is actually 10,171, if you comprehensively went through all the different combinations of that game.
You know how big that number is? Well, OK, if we took all computers in the world together, all the supercomputers, all of the computers in the data centers of the Internet companies and put them all together, run them for 100 years―all you can do is 1,030 , which is so very far from 10,171. So, you can see just by this one game example alone that we are very early in that scratch.
A second group of examples relates to new ways that supercomputers are being used. From ML to AI, there is now a new class of applications changing how supercomputers are used. Traditionally, most supercomputers have been used for simulation. That’s what I call top-down modeling. You create your model out of physics equations or formulas, and then you run that model on a supercomputer to try and make predictions.
The new way of making predictions uses the ML approach. You do not begin with physics. You begin with a blank model, and you keep feeding it data, the outcomes of history and past examples. You keep feeding data into the model, which is written in such a way that for each new piece of data that is fed, a new prediction is made. If the accuracy is not high, you keep tuning the model. Over time―with thousands, hundreds of thousand, and even millions of examples―the model gets tuned to make good predictions. I call this the bottom-up approach.
Now, we have people applying both approaches. Supercomputers used traditionally in a top-down simulation are also employing the bottom-up ML approach. They can work in tandem to make better and faster predictions.
Supercomputers are therefore now being employed for a new class of applications in combination with the traditional or gold-standard simulations.
Gardner: Mark, are we also seeing a democratization of supercomputing? Can we extend these applications and uses? Is what’s happening now decreasing the cost, increasing the value, and therefore opening these systems up to more types of uses and more problem-solving?
Cloud clears the way for easy access
Parsons: Cloud computing is having a big impact on everything that we do, to be quite honest. We have all of our photos in the cloud, our music in the cloud, etc. That’s why EPCC last year got rid of its file server. All our data running the actual organization is in the cloud.
The cloud model is great inasmuch as it allows people who don’t want to operate and run a large system 100 percent of the time the ability to access these technologies in ways they have never been able to do before.
The other side of that is that there are fantastic software frameworks now that didn’t exist even five years ago for doing AI. There is so much open source for doing simulations.
It doesn’t mean that an organization like EPCC, which is a supercomputing center, will stop hosting large systems. We are still great aggregators of demand. We will still have the largest computers. But it does mean that for the first time, through the various cloud providers, any company, any small research group and university has access to the right level of resources that they need in a cost-effective way.
Gardner: Eng Lim, do you have anything more to offer on the value and economics of HPC? Does paying based on use rather than a capital expenditure change the game?
More choices, more innovation
Goh: Oh, great question. There are some applications and institutions with processes that work very well with a cloud, and there are some applications that don’t and processes that don’t. That’s part of the reason why you embrace both. And, in fact, we at HPE embrace the cloud and we also build on-premises solutions for our customers, like the one at the Catalyst UK program.
We also have something that is a mix of the two. We call that HPE GreenLake, which is the ability for us to acquire the system the customer needs, but the customer pays per use. This is software-defined experience on consumption-based economics.
These are some of the options we put together to allow choice for our customers, because there is a variation of needs and processes. Some are more CapEx-oriented in a way they acquire resources and others are more OpEx-oriented.
Gardner: Do you have examples of where some of the fruits of Catalyst and some of the benefits of the ecosystem approach have led to applications, use cases, and demonstrated innovation?
Parsons: What we are trying to do is show how easy ARM is to use. We have taken some really powerful, important code that runs every day on our big national services and have simply moved them across to ARM. Users don’t really understand or don’t need to understand they are running on a different system. It’s that boring.
We have picked up one or two problems with code that probably exist in the x86 version, but because you are running a new processor, it exposes it more, and we are fixing that. But in general―and this is absolutely the wrong message for an interview―we are proceeding in a very boring way. The reason I say that is, it’s really important that this is boring, because if we don’t show this is easy, people won’t put ARM on their next procurement list. They will think that it’s too difficult, that it’s going to be too much trouble to move codes across.
One of the aims of Catalyst, and I am joking, is definitely to be boring. And I think at this point in time we are succeeding.
More interestingly, though, another aim of Catalyst is about storage. The ARM systems around the world today still tend to do storage on x86. The storage will be running on Lustre or BeeGFS server, all sitting on x86 boxes.
We have made a decision to do everything on ARM, if we can. At the moment, we are looking at different storage software on ARM services. We are looking at Ceph, at Lustre, at BeeGFS, because unless you have the ecosystem running in ARM as well, people won’t think it’s as pervasive of a solution as x86, or Power, or whatever.
The benefit of being boring
Goh: Yes, in this case, boring is good. Seamless movement of code across different platforms is the key. It’s very important for an ecosystem to be successful. It needs to be easy to develop code for, and it needs to be easy to port. And those are just as important with our commercial HPC systems for the broader HPC customer base.
In addition to customers writing their own code and compiling it well and easily to ARM, we also want to make it easy for the independent software vendors (ISVs) to join and strengthen this ecosystem.
Parsons: That is one of the key things we intend to do over the next six months. We have good relationships, as does HPE, with many of the big and small ISVs. We want to get them on a new kind of system, let them compile their code, and get some help to do it. It’s really important that we end up with ISV code on ARM, all running successfully.
Gardner: If we are in a necessary, boring period, what will happen when we get to a more exciting stage? Where do you see this potentially going? What are some of the use cases using supercomputers to impact business, commerce, public services, and public health?
Goh: It’s not necessarily boring, but it is brilliantly done. There will be richer choices coming to supercomputing. That’s the key. Supercomputing and HPC need to reach a broader customer base. That’s the goal of our HPC team within HPE.
Over the years, we have increased our reach to the commercial side, such as the financial industry and retailers. Now, there is a new opportunity coming with the bottom-up approach of using HPC. Instead of building models out of physics, we train the models with example data. This is a new way of using HPC. We will reach out to even more users.
So, the success of our supercomputing industry is getting more users, with high diversity, to come on board.
Gardner: Mark, what are some of the exciting outcomes you anticipate?
Parsons: As we get more experience with ARM, it will become a serious player. If you look around the world today, in Japan, for example, they have a big new ARM-based supercomputer that’s going to be similar to the Thunder X2 when it’s launched.
I predict in the next three or four years we are going to see some very significant supercomputers up at the X2 level, built from ARM processors. Based on what I hear, the next generations of these processors will produce a really exciting time.
Gardner: I’m afraid we’ll have to leave it there. We have been exploring a program to expand the variety of CPUs that support supercomputers and AI workloads. And we have specifically learned how the Catalyst UK program is seeding the advancement of the ARM CPU architecture for HPC, as well as helping to establish a vibrant software ecosystem.
Please join me in thanking our guests, Dr. Eng Lim Goh, vice president and chief technology officer for HPC and AI at HPE. Thank you so much, Eng Lim.
Goh: Thank you, Dana.
Gardner: We have also been joined by Professor Mark Parsons, director of EPCC at the University of Edinburgh. Thank you, sir.
Parsons: Thank you, Dana. It’s been a pleasure.
Gardner: And a big thank you as well to our audience for joining this BriefingsDirect Voice of the Customer HPC trends and innovations discussion. I’m Dana Gardner, principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, your host for this ongoing series of Hewlett Packard Enterprise-sponsored discussions.
Thanks again for listening. Pass this along to your IT community, and do come back next time.
Seeding infrastructure innovation for next-gen supercomputing: Lessons for leaders
- The Catalyst UK program's aim is to open up new processor options in HPC, AI, and supercomputing.
- Strong memory bandwidth is a key reason the ARM CPU is so attractive for these workloads.
- As the program advances the ARM architecture for HPC, it's also helping to create a more vibrant software ecosystem.
This article/content was written by the individual writer identified and does not necessarily reflect the view of Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company.