YOUR VIEW: We can’t afford Obama, Democrat spending plan
6 months ago | 405 views | 17 17 comments | 4 4 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Medicare is in trouble.

Social Security is in trouble.

Yet we have a president and Congress that are hellbent on passing another entitlement that we can’t pay for. We will still have people that are uninsured. Mayo Clinic just announced that they will no longer take Medicare patients ($800 million in debt). How many hospitals will follow suit?

Why can’t we fix what’s broken first? Congress won’t consider tort reform or insurance across state lines. (Too many lawyers in Congress!) Why don’t we ask the people that provide our health care to help work on a solution?

When our debt doubles in five years and triples in 10 years, and the interest on our debt will be 85 percent of our tax dollar, there will be no Social Security or Medicare.

Forty cents of every dollar of our 2010 budget is borrowed money. Barack Obama says, “Our spending cannot be sustained,” yet just about every day he comes up with another spending program. Is he one of the 27 percent that thinks the government has its own money?

If you think our economy is on the mend, don’t be deceived. If Obama and Congress don’t change their game plan, we will all suffer.

Congress thinks liberalism will fix problems even though liberalism is what caused the problem in the first place.

Thomas Jefferson said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.”

Elaine Davis

High Point


------------

The insurance industry-run system has failed us

I just had a conversation with a friend of mine who is recovering from a heart attack. He is self-employed and has no insurance because the premiums were so high. He has been saving substantial amounts to pay for care if he needed it. He has depleted his savings and taken out a second mortgage on his house to pay his hospital and doctor bills.

Now, he is facing a loss of his business in the next few months. This is a hardworking, highly competent professional who is facing losing his home, which is almost paid for and going into bankruptcy because the insurance industry has failed him and most of the rest of the country.

I am ashamed of the congressmen and senators who have sold out to the insurance industry and are blocking many people like my friend from access to help when they need it.

I hope some of them will have the courage to do the right thing and vote yes for President Obama’s health care reform.

Ken Knight

Greensboro


------------

A county sheriff needs honesty and integrity

As a resident of Davidson County, a former student of criminal justice and the proud sister of a law enforcement officer, I know the most important components of a law enforcement officer are honesty and integrity.

There are law enforcement officers who are on our streets day and night putting their lives on the line; these officers take that creed seriously.

It is a very important job. To be a sheriff it is important to have integrity and honesty to be able to lead in such an important position.

I don’t understand how a sheriff that was convicted of felonies that went against that creed can run for sheriff. I don’t believe in double standards. If a regular person wanted a job in law enforcement, they would have a criminal background check, and if a felony showed up they would not get the job. Why should it be any different as sheriff?

Sheriff David Grice is a behind-the-scenes sheriff. He doesn’t bask in the glory. Some people think he doesn’t do his job because you will not see Sheriff Grice on TV unless he needs to be.

Sheriff Grice does do his job, though not the commando way we all got used to under Hege’s reign. I know Sheriff Grice; he was my instructor at Davidson County Community College, but that is not why I am writing. I am writing in support of every law enforcement officer that goes to work and takes his job seriously. The officers who would never go against the officers’ creed. The ones who put the badge on every day not knowing if they will come home.

Is it fair to them when we vote someone into office as sheriff who broke the laws they are sworn to uphold?

Sherry Brown

High Point


------------

This novice politician wants real change in Washington

Latimer Alexander (Your View, Feb. 9, “Vote Coble in GOP primary for 6th District”) is right that my wife, Cathy Brewer Hinson, is a novice politician.

She is a novice politician who believes in term limits and one who believes members of Congress should live by the same rules as the rest of the citizens of the country – such as Social Security retirement, no salary increases while the rest of us continue to pay for those increases with higher taxes. She is one who believes that uncontrolled government spending is not the answer to paying off our national debt. She, like many others, was not as active as she could have been in the past, but times like these would wake-up even Rip Van Winkle!

We say we want change, but we continue to elect the same people while expecting results to be different. She knows that the bigger government grows, the less money the private sector has … along with their freedoms! As far as government programs go, she believes it would be better to “teach a person to fish” rather than to become a ward of the state.

Same old politics, divide and confuse. Congress is in gridlock. In our opinion, the more career politicians that are voted out, the louder the people’s voice will be heard. Visit us at www.votehinson.com.

Bryant Hinson

High Point


------------

Remember this next time you go to the polls

Some people, during their lives, might have what some doctors might call an identity crisis. It might help you find your true self if, when you go to the polls the next time, ask yourself before pushing the button, am I voting for this candidate for what he or she promises to give me, or am I voting for a candidate who has promised to take less from me.

Ken Sawyer

High Point


------------

YOUR VIEW POLLS

What must the U.S. do in dealing with Iran since that nation acknowledges producing near weapons-grade uranium? In 30 words or less (no name, address required), e-mail us your thoughts to letterbox@hpe. com.

Should the U.S. military remove the “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy regarding gays serving in the armed forces? In 30 words or less (no name, address required), e-mail us your thoughts to letterbox@hpe. com.
comments (17)
« anonymous wrote on Tuesday, Feb 16 at 01:02 AM »
Australian aborigines are proof that their health care system is broken?

You might wanna check out how American Indians are still suffering compared to everyone else under our "better" system. Using all evidence is tough: it means thinking.

You got nothing.
« mike27282 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 07:08 PM »
One more comment about the Aussie post... nobody with any credibility in America is suggesting that there should be no government. And after thinking about my first reply, there are quite a few examples of good investments by the government: Dams and Locks, National Parks, Interstate Highways, etc. But health insurance? Not a chance.

No problem Snuffbox, I'm sure Coble is a good person and has done a lot of good.

« snuffbox1 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 04:57 PM »
Most of the postings I read have the last name "Hinson". It gives me the impression that this is a political push for CBH. Just wondering if she will take the position for free, and pay her own healthcare, Mmmmmmmmmmmmmm Ponder that.

Mike, I don't care who likes Coble or not, never said nothin' bout anyone expressin' his opinion. I do live in the 6th and I like the box of chocolates that I have. Have a nice day.
« mike27282 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 02:10 PM »
If the Australian healthcare system is so great, then why is the indigenous infant mortality rate three times higher than the national average? And why is their life expectancy 18 - 19 years less than other Australians?

http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Aboriginal_health_issues

From this website:

http://www.healthreform.org.au/

The key problems with the health system are:

·the health gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians

·many Australians cannot access health care when and where they need it

·a chronic shortage of doctors, nurses and other health professionals

·insufficient focus on prevention and primary care

·the inefficient allocation of resources caused by the current State/ Commonwealth funding structure.

Hmmmm... the problems listed here pretty much cover the reasons why rational Americans don't want socialized medicine.

Government investing? Maybe you should go back to your little fantasy world in Oz. The last thing America needs is another liberal.

« Michael Morgan wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 01:13 PM »
Spending? I ask you, how does the national debt really affect you? It is not spending but investing -- investing in health care, in education, in infrastructure is not spending! Investing is what governments do! Do people in America want no government at all? Living here in Australia for the last eleven years, I see the benefits of government INVESTING. We have free health care for everyone -- including YOU, if you come here on a visit and have a health issue. When I visit my beloved USA, I have to buy insurance coverage in case I fall ill or have an accident in America. Education is not only first class here, but not expensive. We have decent roads, libraries, etc. That's why we pay taxes.Wake up, Americans, and rejoice in the greatest administration since Abraham Lincoln!
« Revots... wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 10:56 AM »


Spicoli is clueless about Coble and Iraq. Coble never said we should "cut and run" from Iraq. It's those damn pesky facts - they keep getting in the way of Hughes's (uninformed) opinion.

http://coble.house.gov/Issues/Issue/?IssueID=4217

http://majorityleader.house.gov/docUploads/HouseRepublicansIraqEscalation.pdf

« mike27282 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 10:18 AM »
Snuffbox, you may be happy with Coble, but other people aren't. They deserve a chance to be heard. If Coble is that great then he should have nothing to worry about. But why shouldn't he have to defend his position?

I don't live in the 6th, but when Coble sided with the liberals and said that maybe we should cut and run in Iraq, I lost all respect for him. He's never apologized, and I've never forgiven him.

It doesn't take a genius to realize that if we cut and ran from Iraq like the liberals wanted there would have been genocide and it would have been our fault (just like Pol Pot in Cambodia when Carter was president). It was a stupid thing for Coble to say. He should have known better.

Hinson said she is for term limits. If she gets in and changes her mind, then I would oppose her re-election.

« Revots... wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:53 AM »


Interesting analogy Snuffbox...Cathy Brewer Hinson is a cheap Dollar Store sweater.?.?..I like it.:-)

While it is true that "you do no know what you are going to get" with Hinson as a Congresswoman, I think we can - based on her writing's and her website - make an educated guess...think Virginia Foxx with a lot of Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin wann-be thrown in....disastrous (and Embarrassing) for the people of the NC 6th.

« snuffbox1 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:44 AM »
Mr Hinson;

My last sentence should read:

You know what you have, but you do NOT know what you are going to get. So why vote another person in? Does CBH plan to be in office just a couple of years or does she plan to make a "career" as you are complaining about? Do you really think that she is going to win over Howard Coble?
« snuffbox1 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:32 AM »
Mr. Hinson: If you buy a nice sweater, and it fits well, keeps you warm, and you like it, do you throw it out because its several years old? It will serve you for many, many years, because you purchased quality.

Now if you bought one from the local Dollar Store I can see your point, about throwing it out after a short time.

You know what you have, but you do no know what you are going to get.
« mike27282 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:27 AM »
Good point, snuffbox. When the money starts to come out of their pocket, liberals won't be so liberal anymore.

« snuffbox1 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:11 AM »
Yes Ken Knight, I see where you are coming from: I had a friend that owned a business and it worked out well for him. He built a huge house and paid for it cash. Bought numerous houses and flipped them for a large profit. He also bought rent houses, went on trips to the casinos in Jersey, bought a Harley, gave his children cars, sent them to college, all of them have degrees. But during all this, he just couldn't afford health care. He had a wreck on his Harley, even though not his fault, the other party was driving with no liscense, had no insurance, and no money.

He had to pay his own bill. And do you really think that the taxpayers should pay all his hospital bills?

Was it really too expensive, or was it poor planning on His part? Maybe you should have stepped up to the plate and encouraged your friend to purchase insurance. Maybe you should have added him to your policy, or help bail him out.

Why do you think that the government should pay for "your friend's" healthcare? You must be kidding.
« Revots... wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 08:06 AM »
"Elaine Davis is right on, AS ALWAYS!"....Well, not so much Spicoli. In the very first paragraph She. Is. Wrong. The Mayo Clinic DID NOT stop accepting Medicare patients - This from the Mayo Clinics website;

" Some recent media reports have inaccurately stated that Mayo Clinic in Arizona is no longer seeing any Medicare patients. This is not true.

Rather, a five-physician Mayo Clinic Arizona family practice clinic in Glendale, Ariz., has opted out of Medicare as part of a Mayo Clinic time-limited trial that will be reviewed at its conclusion..."

http://healthpolicyblog.mayoclinic.org/2010/01/05/medicare-and-mayo-clinic-in-arizona/



... Don't you just hate it when the Facts get in the way of your opinion PretendIgnore?
« anewreader wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 07:56 AM »
Ken Knight's insurance-run industry is actually a government-mandated run system. Government has mandated increased coverage for additional ailments and medical conditions over time. Government regulations also prohibit competition among medical insurance providers and ensures that trial lawyers will remain profitable. How much more government "reform" can we really afford that will keep our society economically and physically healthy?
« jbcarper wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 06:33 AM »
I have a question for Mr. Knight whose friend is facing financial difficulties as a result of not having purchased a health insurance program: Did you offer to pay his health insurance premiums back when he was healthy but couldn't afford to do so himself? Surely, you a friend, should be more interested in his financial well being than those of us who do not know him? I am curious why so many people believe that 'government' should be the agency by which some people should be required to pay the health costs of others who have made choices to ignore the potential costs of medical care in their future in favor of having more resources available to spend today.

Surely you recognize that if your friend could not afford to pay his health care premiums, then being required by government decree to pay increased taxes to fund a health care program would not have been any easier? There is no free lunch. Somebody has to pay for the meal. I struggle with the concept that I and others should pick up the tab for those who ate their meal but left paying the bill to others.

There is a reason that health care has become so expensive. Part of the reason is that people don't die from the 'cheap' diseases anymore. It used to be that things like croup, influenza, and measles could kill people off. Then it was consumption or dysentery. As we conquered those diseases, we started dying of cancers and heart disease. These diseases are more expensive to detect, treat and cure. Many killers of the past have not become long-term care options for today. Diabetes and kidney problems have become long-term heath care costs instead of early life enders. If you want to reduce health care costs, are you prepared to go back to having people die at younger ages? Another reason that health care costs look so expensive is the treatment of people who are either unable or unwilling to pay their portions of the health care costs. Those unpaid costs get folded into the bills of those who can and do pay. Hidden welfare benefits without the benefit of feeling charitable.
« mike27282 wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 06:30 AM »
Excellent letters by Ken Sawyer and Elaine Davis!

Elaine Davis is right on, AS ALWAYS! (That's for you stooge.)

Excellent comeback by Bryant Hinson! It's time to start getting rid of the career politicians who've created the mess we're in.

Ken Knight should wonder why his friend couldn't afford insurance. Maybe if taxes weren't so high, and if we didn't have an anti-business president, he would have been able to afford insurance. Now he wants someone else to pay his bills? Sorry, but we need to start getting rid of these tax-n-spend liberals.

« Revots... wrote on Monday, Feb 15 at 06:25 AM »


Based on letters and columns in the HPE CBH has three supporters so far - her dad, her husband and Mike Hughes. Unfortunately for her, Hughes and her husband don't live in the NC 6th and can't vote for her...kind of ironic huh?...Seeing how she doesn't live in the district either.