- Lifestyles
- Features
- Announcements
- Schools
- Faith
- AP-Entertainment
- Opinion
- Editorials
- Commentary
- Polls
- Submit Letter
- Links
- Community
- Schools
- Government
- Interest
YOUR VIEW: How do we pay off this massive national debt?
The value of our dollar is not worth much; the national debt is out of control. If we are going to redistribute the wealth and turn to communism, we need to take some drastic measures now. We could return back to the income tax system of the late 1940s when the time was if your taxable income was over $200,000, you paid 92 percent federal tax and 6 percent state tax, leaving you with 2 percent of the amount over $200,000.
After one year, we could pay off the national debt; pass a law of no borrowing and no loaning of money and no give-a-ways. For all who protested, we could revert to the time when the Cherokee Indians were rounded up and walked the “Trail of Tears” to Oklahoma with the Cherokee Indians in charge, so they could get even. The spirit of Geronimo would probably be heard even though he was not a Cherokee, but was shipped off to Florida and could not even see one of his wives (worse than waterboarding).
We could fast-forward the inheritance tax law that gives the government 50 percent. This way the billionaires could pay down the national debt.
Am I in favor of redistributing the wealth and communism? Absolutely not. It did not work in the first century and has never worked since then.
What do we do? We had the finest nation on Earth. We can have it again if someone will step up and lead us in the right direction.
Cicero Crump
High Point
Why can’t we spend less
on health care?
Here are some thoughts about health care cost.
We spend 16 percent of our gross domestic product on health care annually.
In 2008, our GDP was $14.2 trillion. Sixteen percent of that was $2.272 trillion or about $7,500 per person.
Taiwan copied their health care program after our Medicare program and spent 6 percent of their GDP. For us, that would have been $852 billion, or $2,840 per person.
The difference in the two programs is $1.42 trillion. What could we not do with that money?
Buddy Frazier
High Point
Some say nothing good comes from ‘the projects’
Why do we always stereotype the people who live in our Guilford County communities commonly known as “the projects?” We expect that everyone who comes out of “the projects” will fail. However, some of our nations most influential leaders have come from the poorest of communities.
Who are we to judge a person by where they live?
I’m an intern at the Greensboro Housing Authority and I see a whole different side from what the general public sees. The kids are so full of charisma and hope; they have so many dreams of succeeding and doing great things in life. The problem with this issue is that everyone from “the projects,” is so beaten down by the slashing words that half of them don’t even try anymore. They feel as if taking two steps forward is going to do nothing but bring them two steps backwards again.
Any person in this world has the chance to become anything that they want to. Let’s take the chance to uplift the people in our “projects” and show them that there’s more to life than failure. In life, everything starts with a chance; so let’s give it to them and make a good thing come from “the projects.”
Taja Arrington
Greensboro
Congress should help president revive economy
Please ask the members of Congress to help President Obama get this economy back on track. This is America, and we don’t quit!
Eleanor Wonce
High Point
In a survey, High Pointers said they feel better about the Guilford County Schools than they have in the past. What’s your opinion? In 30 words or less (no name, address required), e-mail us your thoughts (letterbox@hpe. com) on local Guilford schools.

Thanks for the reference to the Peterson Foundation Web site. Interesting and informational.
Vince
I rarely respond to letters unrelated to my own columns, but Cicero Crump touched on a topic I wrote about previously and so I felt I should chime in.
Please forget the reference to communism. This is something else. The fact is that what we are collectively facing is far worse than the nightmare of communism. As American citizns, we need to get our act together - and fast.
For those who wish to understand the immediate importance of our national debt and what it means for every citizen, please watch the documentary, "I.O.U.S.A." - which you can locate at DVD retailers like Best Buy or Amazon.com.
A short version of the film and additional information can be found at: www.iousathemovie.com
Also, an excellent resource regarding the national debt and finances that I would strongly recommend everyone look into is the Peter G. Peterson Foundation: www.pgpf.org
Do your research. Then take action!
Robert Healy
Even Mike's linked article makes this clear, defeating his own "point".
Americans regularly go overseas for vital medical procedures they can't afford here.
As usual, the screamy semi-literate Closet Pubs fail in their desperate arguments.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect
To pay off the $12.5T national debt, on a "30 year mortage, 6%' would require a payment equal to around 35% of our annual US Tax collected. That's a pretty steep 'house payment'.
So we cut out 30% of our current spending to get balanced and then further reduce current spending to allow for the debt payments.
Like most debt junkies, we can't imagine how we could change our current life style. There is nothing significant that we can cut, right? Defense related spending is 23%, that can't be reduced in a time of "war". SS/Medicare/Medicade: 39% of spending: how can we cut this without forsaking Grandma? Other Mandatory expenditures: 17% : Well they are mandatatory aren't they? Ahh: discretionary spending: 12%. If we cut out every dime of discretionary spending, we would be...only a 1/3 of the way there.
No easy choices or decisions. If they were easy, politicians would have made them long ago.
I suspect that at some point, we just will chose to ignore the national debt and pretend that it doesn't exist anymore.
Medicare would have been gone years ago if they had to compete with private entities. Let me promise you that you really wouldn't want to live in Taiwan!
I wonder why a Canadian Provincial Premier recnetly camde to the U.S. for his needed heart surgery. Oh, the surgery was not available in his province. He office didn't know whether it was available elsewhere in Canada.
Not too long ago the Italian leader, Berlesconi also came here for his heart surgry! You people need to wake up before it's too late.
Buddy, you want a car without power steering, power windows and seats, air conditioning, anti-lock brakes, radio,, including Sattelite, CD player, auto transmission, you can buy one at your local Studebaker dealer!
What's the point of Buddy Frazier's letter? Costs are lower in Taiwan because they have less to spend money on. How many people have you heard about going to Taiwan for healthcare that they can't get in the US?
Now how many people come to the US for healthcare that they can't get in their own country? How many Premier's of Newfoundland and Labrador (that's Canada for you liberals) come to the US to get heart surgery because they can't get it in Canada?
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/canada/breakingnews/83387162.html
That story should put the final nail in the coffin of Obamacare - but of course it won't, because Obamacare isn't about healthcare, it's about big government control.
Healthcare costs more in the US because we have more services available. Another bogus liberal argument debunked! Should it cost less? Sure. Will Obamacare (the dishonestly named "public option") lower costs? Of course not! Works great in Canada, doesn't it!
Excellent letter by Taja Arrington! I would only make one minor change. Instead of saying, "Let's take a chance to uplift the people..." I would say, "Let's give the people a chance to uplift themselves..." In other words, get government out of their way. A helping hand, yes... generational poverty and dependance, no.