- Lifestyles
- Features
- Announcements
- Schools
- Faith
- AP-Entertainment
- Opinion
- Editorials
- Commentary
- Polls
- Submit Letter
- Links
- Community
- Schools
- Government
- Interest
OUR VIEW: Dell provides a painful lesson
The former state Supreme Court justice, who is now head of a conservative public interest group in Raleigh, could be shouting “I told you so” or “I was right, you were wrong” or various other taunts as the Triad and state reel from Wednesday’s announcement that Dell will close its Forsyth County computer manufacturing plant early next year.
But Orr, who also ran for the GOP nomination for governor last year, isn’t that kind of a guy. Instead, the vocal opponent of incentives in general and specifically Dell’s $279 million state and local incentives package granted in 2004, has expressed regrets for the 905 job loses and the negative economic impact in the Triad. He’s also commenting that if the state must have an incentives program, it should be to encourage small businesses and home-grown industry with strong Tarheel State ties, not massive, interstate and international corporations that just want the best business deals they can negotiate.
In a statement Wednesday, Orr noted that “No matter how big the incentive package, operational decisions by businesses headquartered out-of-state will be driven by corporate financial considerations and not by any sense of loyalty to the community being left behind.”
The amount of taxpayer money Dell has received so far isn’t clear yet, but we suspect it’s in the tens of millions of dollars. It will be up to the lawyers and accountants representing state and local taxpayers to make sure in the coming months that the state and local governments get all the money they possibly can out of Dell and return it to state and local coffers.
And as for Orr, no, he isn’t gloating over how Dell’s stay in North Carolina has turned out and how correct he was in assessing the situation. But he’s still making his position on incentives clear to all. And now, perhaps, more of us are listening to him.

Doesn't it cost money to train the unskilled workers in Mexico and third party providers? Who pays for these costs?
I'm quoting "Mexican labor costs basically are 10% of US costs, according to AMTAC in Washington!" Well, this being the case, wouldn't the shipping and handling costs add up to more than 10%? Did no one think this S & H money would be added back to the cost of anything consumers buy?
Taxpayers would like to know who pays the salaries for all the coalitions, non-profit organizations, and Good Jobs First in Washington that, like politicians, sit back and dole out decisions that's certainly not good for America, let alone North Carolina, but yet, politicians hop on the bandwagon, because someone in Washington says so. Let's look at common sense "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is!" I'm sure no one in politics understands facts and figures and this is why when the "Mr. Slick comes to town with his presentation and meets with the local, state, and federal politicians, they don't want Taxpayers to know they don't know nor understand what's going on nor how private businesses run. After all, they couldn't hold a job in the private sector and this is why their in local, state, and federal jobs! They also feel "it's not their money". Taxpayers feel this type of thinking is what put America into bankruptcy!
Taxpayers have the right to put an end to INCENTIVES! THIS SHOULD BE DONE IMMEDIATELY, AS GETTING PEOPLE'S HOPES UP FOR A 'TEMP' JOB (AND MOST INCENTIVE-TYPE COMPANIES ARE JUST TEMPORARY),AND IS NOT STABILITY, LET ALONE GOOD FOR OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN!