OUR VIEW: Citizens still in dark about shooting
2 years ago | 832 views | 1 1 comments | 7 7 recommendations | email to a friend | print
As noted in this space Sept. 22, no matter what the circumstances were surrounding the death of UNC-Chapel Hill student Courtland Smith, it was a tragic occurrence. Smith was shot by Archdale police along Interstate 85 Randolph County just before 5 a.m. on Aug. 23. Since then, Archdale police have jealously guarded documentary information about the case, and County Superior Court Judge V. Bradford Long has helped curtail public access to it.

Officers had conducted a traffic stop “regarding a subject who called for police assistance and indicated he was suicidal,” according to an Archdale police news release. At first, the citizens of North Carolina were denied access to audio recordings of the incident as Randolph sealed them, then unsealed them after Guilford Metro 911, which Smith also had called, released an audio recording that indicated Smith was driving drunk, suicidal and armed with a 9 mm pistol. Smith’s family has contended Smith was not armed when he was shot four times.

Earlier this week, Long denied a request by several media outlets, including The High Point Enterprise, to view dashboard videotapes of the incident from two Archdale police cars that he said “portray the interaction between Mr. Smith and the officers immediately prior to the shooting and actions taken by the officers after the shooting.” Long ruled that releasing the video would hinder the case and jeopardize the right of potential defendants to receive a fair trial.

A plethora of questions by the media and public has arisen since the shooting, and the judge’s refusal to release the videos does little to serve the public. Long’s ruling should have broadened public access rather than further limit it.
Comments
(1)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
attorneywatchdog
|
November 05, 2009
Well, looks like Garland Yates, the DA of Randolph County is going to face a like situation as DA Stuart Albright in 2004, when he had to rely upon a final investigative report by the Northern Piedemont District SBI, indicating seven shots were fired from a High Point officer's firearm that resulted in the death of Antonio Pryce, when nine shots were identified in the medical examiner's report. This case has been brought to the attention of the SBI and officials of High Point, but does this have to happen again in Randolph County when there are two videotapes that can show what happened. Cliff Parker just recently, in receipt of information regarding the 2004 shooting, indicated, the Attorney General's Office would have to request any further investigation of the 2004 shooting since DA Albright made his determination and the case was closed as a justifiable homicide. But, that was not the case, and this same information is now being sent to his director, Ms. Pendergraft to review and determine if what was disclosed in the SBI's report, refuting the findings of a medical examiner's report, warrants an internal investigation. Has DA Yates viewed the tapes himself, not one of his assistant district attorneys, but himself to determine if the tapes corroborate what was released to the public on the 911 tape? Hopefully, the video tapes do not refute the 911 tape, but if they continue to be sealed, the public and media will only make assumptions based upon limited facts.
Read & enjoy these special sections to the High Point Enterprise!